Return to previous location Back to Ethics Table of Contents Next Item -->
John Vasconcellos to David Boulton and Phil Ryan et al re Ethics - Ethics 10
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: DAVID BOULTON'S RESPONSE TO airport security PROPOSAL
HELLO AGAIN DAVID - PHIL -
In a message dated 3/12/02 6:06:54 PM, David Boulton writes:
Phil, I like and agree with what you said. I agree 'un-communicated
information is conveyed (systemic) ignorance'. I like Callixa's approach and
I have actually recommended them to a significant client of mine. I think we
should implement such a system for airline security. My only concern is that
this kind of intelligence-information power can be abused. Once the
disparate systems are subsumed and integrated to provide such on-demand
power, the cost of mining that data for other non initially intended uses is
comparatively low. The issue that emerges for me is similar to human
cloning. Will our society's learning keep pace with and help drive the
ethical debate regarding the limits we impose on such systems? I don't know.
I think we must proceed here and I think before doing so the advocates
should be engaged in a rigorous, non commercially prejudiced, dialogue into
these issues with people who advocate the freedoms of privacy. - Best, David
AMEN, DAVID, AMEN!!
Return to previous location Back to Ethics Table of Contents Next Item -->
© 2017 COPYRIGHT All Rights Reserved, Except: Permission to use, copy, and distribute these materials for not-for-profit educational purposes, without fee and without a signed licensing agreement, is hereby granted, provided that "Implicity" - www.implicity.org" (with a functioning hyperlink when online) be cited as the source and appear in all excerpts, copies, and distributions. Thank you. |